Human Resource Management

discussion/journal

Discussion: 1-2 Paragraphs W/ references  In organizational change, there is a debate in the literature about the benefits of proactive versus reactive change e

May 19, 2025 0 views

This is a sample solution our expert wrote for a client with similar requirements.

Discussion: 1-2 Paragraphs W/ references  In organizational change, there is a debate in the literature about the benefits of proactive versus reactive change efforts. Your instructor will assign you one side of the debate, either proactive change or reactive change. While both positions in each argument are important, your task is to state why you believe your side is more important than the other position and support the argument with at least three references from peer-reviewed literature using APA formatting. Your argument should contain a conclusion and the reasons to accept the conclusion. Journal: Article attached  Given what you read in the required article this week and what you learned from the positions presented by your colleagues in the discussion topic, complete a journal assignment that answers the following questions: (a) For organizational change to be successful, what role should a leader take in vision development? (b) How would you weave proactive and reactive elements into the planning and implementation of an organizational change effort? 1-2 page word document.

Need a similar assignment?

Our expert writers can help you with your specific requirements. Get started today.

Order Your Custom Solution

Get a Price Estimate

Price Estimate

Deadline.

Number of Pages.

Price: $12

Order Now

Why Students Choose Us

  • Original Work: 100% plagiarism-free with free Turnitin report

  • Unlimited Revisions: Until you're completely satisfied

  • Expert Writers: PhD-qualified in your subject area

  • 24/7 Support: Always available to assist you